|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Cable Uta
V0LTA
WE FORM V0LTA
4
   |
Posted - 2017.02.22 12:37:46 -
[1] - Quote
Agilis Andedare wrote:It's as if thousands of renters are going to suddenly cry out in terror....
This is a great change!
You, I like you :D |
Cable Uta
V0LTA
WE FORM V0LTA
4
|
Posted - 2017.02.22 12:42:03 -
[2] - Quote
Ncc 1709 wrote:I assume with this change, interdiction nullification will be removed too?
How about just not afk ratting in your "safe" bubbled systems? :) |
Cable Uta
V0LTA
WE FORM V0LTA
4
|
Posted - 2017.02.22 13:25:44 -
[3] - Quote
Sgt Ocker wrote:Orca Platypus wrote:Cable Uta wrote:Ncc 1709 wrote:I assume with this change, interdiction nullification will be removed too? How about just not afk ratting in your "safe" bubbled systems? :) How about you stfu about a playstyle you're completely clueless about? Having to break ratting for every curious Thrasher is the same as not ratting at all. Your ratting ship/s have to dock up because they can't kill a curious thrasher? Even if it had a cyno fit you should be able to pop it before he gets to light it. Risk vs Reward - The fundamental backbone of Eve, get one (a backbone that is)
diz post <3 |
Cable Uta
V0LTA
WE FORM V0LTA
5
|
Posted - 2017.02.22 13:26:42 -
[4] - Quote
Mr Floydy wrote:ITT. Nerf Thrashers!
Yes the mighty Thrasher menace needs a serious nerf! |
Cable Uta
V0LTA
WE FORM V0LTA
5
|
Posted - 2017.02.22 13:28:51 -
[5] - Quote
Orca Platypus wrote:Bronson Hughes wrote:Bubbles are still effectively permanent (scoop, redeploy) so long as a player is willing to put in the effort to make them so. This is looking to be the biggest chore of all eve should you decide to do it. 2/3 of hisec quit for less. Bronson Hughes wrote:Generating killmails puts them on par with other deployables, which is good from the standpoint of consistency. However, I'm still not convinced that deployables should generate killmails at all, so I would rather the change gone the other way. Having deployables not generate killmails would lead to them being used (and destroyed) more often, both by the killboard-sensitive and those not wanting to give free intel.
Overall, kinda meh. this.
So you're telling me there needs to be a retardproof area where anyone with a reaction time >5m can live?
If this is your thought you should stay in highsec and leave nullsec to the big bois. kkthxbai <3 |
Cable Uta
V0LTA
WE FORM V0LTA
5
|
Posted - 2017.02.22 13:32:48 -
[6] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:lanyaie wrote:Will Mobile warp disruptors have their material requirements changed due to this proposed change to balance for the increased consumption? Not at this time. If we do something more drastic in the future like dramatically shorten lifespans or making the bubbles disposable then we'd re-evaluate material inputs at that time and consider changes.
Don't see why cost mineral cost would be edited, I mean a T1 large bubble is what 30m? T2 like 50?
I you manage them and don't just throw them out as trash you won't be loosing any money. |
Cable Uta
V0LTA
WE FORM V0LTA
6
|
Posted - 2017.02.22 14:27:00 -
[7] - Quote
DS9 wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:Scooping and re-deploying a bubble would reset the decay timer. Could you please explain how this will work? I think it would be cool if anyone could scoop the bubble if it's left there for let's say 12 hours and decide what to do with it. Otherwise with those long, 2 week timers and making it that only the bubble owner has an ability to redeploy the bubble, things won't change and most gates will still have 100 bubbles causing lag and problems.
Any bubble has to be unanchored to be scooped, so doubt the can make it "anyone can take" simply cause it needs to be unanchored :P |
Cable Uta
V0LTA
WE FORM V0LTA
6
|
Posted - 2017.02.22 15:04:45 -
[8] - Quote
Orca Platypus wrote:
4) WH with crit connections farming. Risk : none (nobody can bring enough firepower). Reward: stupid high.
...the list goes on...
"The greater the reward, the greater should be the risk." - there should be either no exceptions or no such rule.
Cause there is totally 0 risk of a group like say HK or the old BU or other WH entities rolling into you and raping the **** out of you, OR actually getting a fight!
And its totally op isk in WH space, oh wait didn't CCP nerf that recently?
Last id like for you to continue the list that "goes on".
There is risk with all types of ratting but the risk need to be proportionate with the income it generates, and currently Nullsec is scewed towards high isk & practicly 0 risk.
This change is a good please don't back down ccp <3 |
|
|
| |
|